Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114811
Title: Surgeons' perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey
Authors: Cobianchi, Lorenzo
Piccolo, Daniele
Dal Mas, Francesca
Agnoletti, Vanni
Ansaloni, Luca
Balch, Jeremy
Biffl, Walter
Butturini, Giovanni
Catena, Fausto
Coccolini, Federico
Denicolai, Stefano
De Simone, Belinda
Frigerio, Isabella
Fugazzola, Paola
Marseglia, Gianluigi
Marseglia, Giuseppe Roberto
Martellucci, Jacopo
Modenese, Mirko
Previtali, Pietro
Ruta, Federico
Venturi, Alessandro
Kaafarani, Haytham M
Loftus, Tyler J.
Alexandrino, Henrique 
Team Dynamics Study Group
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Clinical decision-making; Decision aids; Trauma and emergency surgery; Survey
Issue Date: 3-Jan-2023
Publisher: Springer Nature
Serial title, monograph or event: World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
Abstract: Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons’ knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society’s website and Twitter profile. Results 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons’ preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114811
ISSN: 1749-7922
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons