Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114811
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCobianchi, Lorenzo-
dc.contributor.authorPiccolo, Daniele-
dc.contributor.authorDal Mas, Francesca-
dc.contributor.authorAgnoletti, Vanni-
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorBalch, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorBiffl, Walter-
dc.contributor.authorButturini, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Fausto-
dc.contributor.authorCoccolini, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorDenicolai, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorDe Simone, Belinda-
dc.contributor.authorFrigerio, Isabella-
dc.contributor.authorFugazzola, Paola-
dc.contributor.authorMarseglia, Gianluigi-
dc.contributor.authorMarseglia, Giuseppe Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorMartellucci, Jacopo-
dc.contributor.authorModenese, Mirko-
dc.contributor.authorPrevitali, Pietro-
dc.contributor.authorRuta, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorVenturi, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorKaafarani, Haytham M-
dc.contributor.authorLoftus, Tyler J.-
dc.contributor.authorAlexandrino, Henrique-
dc.contributor.authorTeam Dynamics Study Group-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T11:01:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-12T11:01:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-03-
dc.identifier.issn1749-7922pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/114811-
dc.description.abstractBackground Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons’ knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society’s website and Twitter profile. Results 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons’ preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectArtificial intelligencept
dc.subjectClinical decision-makingpt
dc.subjectDecision aidspt
dc.subjectTrauma and emergency surgerypt
dc.subjectSurveypt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshClinical Decision-Makingpt
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnairespt
dc.subject.meshArtificial Intelligencept
dc.subject.meshSurgeonspt
dc.titleSurgeons' perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international surveypt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage1pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleWorld Journal of Emergency Surgerypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3pt
degois.publication.volume18pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-03*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on May 22, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons