Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/108219
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPoeschl, Gabrielle-
dc.contributor.authorValentim, Joaquim P.-
dc.contributor.authorPapastamou, Stamos-
dc.contributor.authorChryssochoou, Xenia-
dc.contributor.authorProdromitis, Gerasimos-
dc.contributor.authorPavlopoulos, Vassilis-
dc.contributor.authorMari, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorVolpato, Chiara-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-18T10:36:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-18T10:36:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2119-4130pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/108219-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we analyse the responses of 450 students from Greece, Portugal and Italy, who were asked to assess the efficacy of 32 actions as reactions against the austerity measures implemented to deal with the financial and economic crisis. These actions were organized into six types by a principal component factor analysis, and were ranked as follows from the most effective to the least effective: protectionism, civic participation, political resistance to government measures, individual financial protection, economic resistance to government measures and violence. Results showed that Greek respondents, who were in the most difficult socioeconomic situation, viewed all types of actions, except civic participation and individual financial protection, as more effective than the other respondents did. Regression analyses revealed, however, that crisis-related variables, in particular, the attribution of responsibility for the crisis to internal factors and not to the people, and individual-related variables, such as political orientation and the intensity of depressive feelings, were strong predictors of the assessment of the efficacy of actions, in addition to the socioeconomic situation of the countries.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherUbiquity Presspt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjecteconomic crisispt
dc.subjectperceived efficacy of actionspt
dc.subjectsocioeconomic situationpt
dc.subjectattribution of responsibilitypt
dc.subjectindividual-related variablespt
dc.titlePredictors of the Perceived Efficacy of Actions Against Austerity Measurespt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage41pt
degois.publication.lastPage51pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleInternational Review of Social Psychologypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/irsp.96pt
degois.publication.volume30pt
dc.date.embargo2017-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.researchunitIPCDHS – Institute of Cognitive Psychology, Human and Social Development-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9632-3693-
Aparece nas coleções:FPCEUC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Mostrar registo em formato simples

Google ScholarTM

Verificar

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este registo está protegido por Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons