Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/96299
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tesser, Charles Dalcanale | - |
dc.contributor.author | Serapioni, Mauro | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-09T10:19:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-09T10:19:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1678-4561 | pt |
dc.identifier.issn | 1413-8123 | pt |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/96299 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the light of the comparative analysis of health systems, we discuss three strategic phenomena for the SUS universalization, as follows: a) health tax expenditures; b) State funding of private plans for public servants; and c) trade union's demand for private health plans. Among the ideal types of health systems, SUS is universal in law, but hybrid in practice: Beveridgian in primary health care (PHC) and mixed in specialized/hospital care; without really being universal (public spending is only 43% of total health expenditure). There is a massive state subsidy to the private sector, through health tax expenditures (30% of the federal health budget) and financing of private plans for public servants, which generates incoherence, segmentation of the health system and inequities. Despite the general support to the SUS, the union movements have been using private health plans in collective recruitment (76% of them), reinforcing the private sector. Reducing health tax expenditures - including state funding of servants' private plans - would significantly increase the SUS budget and facilitate articulation between health workers and trade unionists, bringing the high strength of unions closer to the long struggle for the universality of the SUS and PHC. | pt |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt |
dc.publisher | ABRASCO | pt |
dc.rights | openAccess | pt |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | pt |
dc.subject | Health systems | pt |
dc.subject | Health policy | pt |
dc.subject | Healthcare financing | pt |
dc.subject | Unified health system | pt |
dc.subject | Health inequalities | pt |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | pt |
dc.subject.mesh | Labor Unions | pt |
dc.subject.mesh | Private Sector | pt |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Expenditures | pt |
dc.subject.mesh | Insurance, Health | pt |
dc.title | Obstacles to SUS universalization: tax expenditures, labor union demands and health insurance state subsidy | pt |
dc.type | article | - |
degois.publication.firstPage | 2323 | pt |
degois.publication.lastPage | 2333 | pt |
degois.publication.issue | 6 | pt |
degois.publication.title | Ciência & Saúde Coletiva | pt |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021266.22602019 | pt |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/1413-81232021266.22602019 | pt |
degois.publication.volume | 26 | pt |
dc.date.embargo | 2021-01-01 | * |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34231742 | - |
uc.date.periodoEmbargo | 0 | pt |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000669559200030 | - |
item.fulltext | Com Texto completo | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.author.researchunit | CES – Centre for Social Studies | - |
crisitem.author.researchunit | CES – Centre for Social Studies | - |
crisitem.author.parentresearchunit | University of Coimbra | - |
crisitem.author.parentresearchunit | University of Coimbra | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-5761-2660 | - |
Appears in Collections: | I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obstacles to SUS universalization.pdf | 121.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
194
checked on Oct 16, 2024
Download(s)
98
checked on Oct 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License