Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/95930
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Patrícia V.-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Rafaela P.-
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Leonor M.-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Andreia F.-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Rui C.-
dc.contributor.authorQuina, Margarida J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T14:08:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-21T14:08:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/95930-
dc.description.abstractThe agro-industry of tomato generates three types of residues: ripe rotten tomato (unfit for consumption) (RT), green (unripe) tomato (GT), and tomato branches including leaves and stems (TB). These materials are commonly wasted or used as feed for livestock. Energy production through anaerobic digestion is an alternative way to manage and simultaneously valorise these materials. Initially, the operating conditions of mono anaerobic digestion were investigated using RT. Thus, a design of experiments based on a two-level fractional factorial design with resolution V was performed to determine the factors that affect biochemical methane potential (BMP). The substrate to inoculum ratio (SIR), total volatile solids concentration (VSt ), working volume (WV), presence of nutrients (Nu), and the pre-incubation of the inoculum (Inc) were investigated. The results showed that SIR is the most important factor. The maximum BMP for RT was 297 NmLCH4/gVS with SIR = 0.5; tVS = 20 g/L; WV = 20%; no pre-incubation and the presence of nutrients. Using these optimum operating conditions, co-digestion was investigated through a mixture design approach. The substrates RT and GT presented similar BMP values, whereas TB led to a significantly lower BMP. Indeed, when high concentrations of TB were used, a significant decrease in methane production was observed. Nonetheless, the highest BMP was achieved with a mixture of 63% RT + 20% GT + 17% TB, with a production of 324 NmLCH4/gVS, corresponding to a synergetic co-digestion performance index of about 1.20. In general, although the substrate RT generates the highest BMP, the mixture with GT did not impair the methane yield. Overall, the co-digestion of tomato residues must be conducted with SIR close to 0.5 and the content of tomato branches in the reaction mixture should be kept low (up to 20%). © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.relationSFRH/BD/145694/2019pt
dc.relationCENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectAgro-industrial residuespt
dc.subjectAnaerobic digestionpt
dc.subjectBiochemical methane potentialpt
dc.subjectCo-digestionpt
dc.subjectDesign of experimentspt
dc.titleBioenergy Production through Mono and Co-Digestion of Tomato Residuespt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage5563pt
degois.publication.issue17pt
degois.publication.titleEnergiespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en14175563pt
degois.publication.volume14pt
dc.date.embargo2021-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIEPQPF – Chemical Process Engineering and Forest Products Research Centre-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIEPQPF – Chemical Process Engineering and Forest Products Research Centre-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Sciences and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Sciences and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1376-0829-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9651-2427-
Appears in Collections:I&D CIEPQPF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
energies-14-05563.pdf1.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

118
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

83
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons