Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87561
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Carolina-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T14:16:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-13T14:16:40Z-
dc.date.issued2013-04-
dc.identifier.issn1647-9548pt
dc.identifier.issn1647-8681pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/87561-
dc.description.abstractBy recognizing the reciprocity between space and use, buildings are conceived not only as stages but also as producers of human behavior, and their users are both spectators and creators of meaning by appropriating space. Hence, space use is the actual acknowledgment of the design process when encountering life. The most common ways of incorporating space use onto the design process are translated by general information, such as: standards, theoretical models and conventions. However, each project implies a deep recognition of its context, users and needs, properly suiting the space conceived by the architect to its future appropriation. Therefore, the study of space use is an operative tool for the design process, informing on quantitative and qualitative variables, invariables and specificities of a real life scenario. Despite having different study fields (whether of a more mathematical, phenomenological or sociological nature), disciplines in the scope of “Evidence-Based Design”, such as Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Space Syntax and Usability Studies, act as input to the design process - a feedforward technique that complements the architect’s options, embracing Schön’s (1983) “reflection in action” concept. Through these instruments, the project will result on a more thorough one, supported by user research outputs and the feedback of a broader stakeholders’ community. This will bring closer the space thought by the architect during the design process and the space lived in by the individual afterwards.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherEDARQpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectSpace Usept
dc.subjectParticipatory design processpt
dc.subjectEvidence-based designpt
dc.titleSpace use as an input to the design processpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage47pt
degois.publication.lastPage50pt
degois.publication.issue04pt
degois.publication.locationCoimbrapt
degois.publication.titleJoelho: Revista de Cultura Arquitectónicapt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://impactum-journals.uc.pt/joelho/article/view/1459pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.14195/1647-8681_4_4pt
dc.date.embargo2013-04-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Nacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Space Use as an input to the Design Process.pdf339.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

242
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

262
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons