Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87545
Title: | The failure to examine failures in democratic innovation | Authors: | Spada, Paolo Ryan, Matt |
Issue Date: | 2017 | Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | Serial title, monograph or event: | PS: Political Science & Politics | Volume: | 50 | Issue: | 3 | Place of publication or event: | Cambridge | Abstract: | Deliberation scholars have changed the landscape of democratic theory irreversibly, providing us with a coherent set of principles that undergird contemporary approaches to democracy making (e.g., Bohman 1998; Gutmann and Thompson 1996). Deliberation has become a normative project owned and invested in by practitioners of democracy worldwide (see Bherer, Gauthier, and Simmard 2016). The relevance of deliberative democracy is clear, as it seeks to respond to a set of disquieting contemporary phenomena that increasingly manifest in declining social capital and trust, and increasing deference to extremist populist appeals. | Description: | To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000579 | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87545 | ISSN: | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1049096517000579 | Rights: | closedAccess |
Appears in Collections: | I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Failure to Examine Failures.pdf | 313.39 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
29
checked on Nov 11, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
28
checked on May 2, 2023
Page view(s)
301
checked on Oct 16, 2024
Download(s)
89
checked on Oct 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.