Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7929
Title: The stability and growth pact, fiscal policy institutions and stabilization in Europe
Authors: Marinheiro, Carlos Fonseca 
Issue Date: 2008
Citation: International Economics and Economic Policy. 5:1 (2008) 189-207
Abstract: Ever since its inception, the EMU has been subject to controversy. The fiscal policy rules embedded in the Maastricht Treaty, and clarified in the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), are probably the most contentious. The SGP has constantly been accused of being too rigid and of forcing procyclicality in fiscal policy. However, in an influential paper Galí and Perotti (2003) concluded that discretionary fiscal policy has actually become more countercyclical in EMU countries since the Maastricht Treaty. This paper argues that this conclusion stands up to several robustness tests using ex-post data, including the use of institutional variables, but not to the use of real-time data. Using ex-post data, there is some evidence pointing to a more countercyclical use of discretionary fiscal policy (or at least to less use of procyclical discretionary fiscal policy). However, the use of real-time data for the period 1999–2006 reveals that discretionary fiscal policy has been designed to be procyclical. Hence, the actual acyclical behaviour of discretionary fiscal policy in the period after 1999 seems to be simply the result of errors in forecasting the output gap, and not the result of a change in the intentions of policy-makers. As a result, there is no evidence to support the view that Maastricht rules have forced euro-area policy-makers to change their behaviour and design countercyclical discretionary fiscal policies.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7929
DOI: 10.1007/s10368-008-0110-3
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
obra.pdf233.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on May 29, 2020

Page view(s)

209
checked on Sep 14, 2020

Download(s)

132
checked on Sep 14, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.