Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/45742
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPedro Brito, Rui-
dc.contributor.authorSebastião, Hélder-
dc.contributor.authorGodinho, Pedro-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-06T23:36:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-28-
dc.identifier.issn1470-8272por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/45742-
dc.description.abstractThis article proposes a flexible methodology for portfolio selection using a skewness/semivariance biobjective optimisation framework. The solutions of this biobjective optimisation problem allow the investor to analyse the efficient trade-off between skewness and semivariance. This methodology is used empirically on four data sets, collected from the Fama/French data library. The out-of-sample performance of the skewness/semivariance model was assessed by choosing three portfolios belonging to each in-sample Pareto frontier and measuring their performance in terms of skewness per semivariance ratio, Sharpe ratio and Sortino ratio. Both the in-sample and the out-of-sample performance analyses were conducted using three different target returns for the semivariance computations. The results show that the efficient skewness/semivariance portfolios are consistently competitive when compared with several benchmark portfolios.por
dc.description.sponsorshipRui Pedro Brito was funded by the Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (FCT) under the scholarship SFRH/BD/94778/2013.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.rightsembargoedAccess-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/por
dc.subjectportfolio selectionpor
dc.subjectsemivariancepor
dc.subjectskewnesspor
dc.subjectmultiobjective optimisationpor
dc.subjectderivative-free optimisationpor
dc.titleEfficient skewness/semivariance portfoliospor
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage331por
degois.publication.lastPage346por
degois.publication.issue5por
degois.publication.titleJournal of Asset Managementpor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fjam.2016.9por
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/jam.2016.9por
degois.publication.volume17por
dc.date.embargo2019-01-06T23:36:20Z-
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitGroup for Monetary and Financial Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7871-7058-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1743-6869-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2247-7101-
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
skewnessS.pdf476.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Apr 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

6
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

255
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s) 50

909
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons