Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/41821
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, David-
dc.contributor.authorPires, Ana Elisabete-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T15:56:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/41821-
dc.description.abstractThe study of bioarchaeological evidence associated with burials is essential for achieving a global perspective on cremation as a funerary practice, its chronological and geographical distribution, as well as its inner socio-cultural and technological diversity. However, for that purpose, similar and consistent analyses must be adopted by bioarchaeologists to enable intra- and inter-sites comparisons. The 1995–2015 literature encompassing 84 geographically representative articles concerning bioarchaeological studies of burned human skeletal remains is reviewed herein. The objective was to assess methodological variability. Information concerning colour, fragmentation, skeleton completeness, ‘skeletal region’ representation, non-human funerary assemblage, pre-burning condition of the remains, minimum number of individuals, biological profile, trauma and pathologies was considered. The results demonstrate that certain methods were used by almost all researchers. That was the case for colour description (91 %), skeleton completeness (91 %), minimum number of individuals (96 %), age-at-death (100 %) and sex of the individuals (95 %). Researchers are much more divided about the implementation of the remaining methods. Methodological choices also vary. The asymmetries in the selection of the analyses that are undertaken can lead to different interpretations and conclusions of the contexts under study. This may prevent consistent comparisons within the same site and between different sites. We emphasize the need for bioarchaeologists to discuss and standardize analytical procedures for studying cremated remains.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.rightsembargoedAccess-
dc.titleCremation under fire: a review of bioarchaeological approaches from 1995 to 2015por
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.titleArchaeological and Anthropological Sciencespor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12520-016-0333-0-
dc.date.embargo2018-06-08T15:56:22Z-
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0607-5631-
Appears in Collections:I&D CIAS - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Gonçalves and Pires 2016.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s) 50

511
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s) 50

681
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.