Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36599
Title: Semi- vs. Fully-Distributed Urban Stormwater Models: Model Set Up and Comparison with Two Real Case Studies
Authors: Pina, Rui 
Ochoa-Rodriguez, Susana 
Simões, Nuno Eduardo 
Mijic, Ana 
Sá Marques, Alfeu 
Maksimovic, Cedo 
Keywords: urban drainage; urban stormwater models; urban pluvial flooding; fully-distributed models; semi-distributed models; rainfall–runoff modeling
Issue Date: 16-Feb-2016
Publisher: mdpi
Project: European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 641931 
Serial title, monograph or event: water
Volume: 8
Issue: 58
Abstract: Urban stormwater models can be semi-distributed (SD) or fully distributed (FD). SD models are based on subcatchment units with various land use types, where rainfall is applied and runoff volumes are estimated and routed. FD models are based on the two dimensional (2D) discretization of the overland surface, which has a finer resolution with each grid-cell representing one land use type, where runoff volumes are estimated and directly routed by the 2D overland flow module. While SD models have been commonly applied in urban stormwater modeling, FD models are generally more detailed and theoretically more realistic. This paper presents a comparison between SD and FD models using two case studies in Coimbra (Portugal) and London (UK). To enable direct comparison between SD and FD setups, a model-building process is proposed and a novel sewer inlet representation is applied. SD and FD modeling results are compared against observed records in sewers and photographic records of flood events. The results suggest that FD models are more sensitive to surface storage parameters and require higher detail of the sewer network representation.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36599
ISSN: ISSN 2073-4441
DOI: 10.3390/w8020058
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Civil - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Pina et al, 2016.pdf7.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 5

50
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

282
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

312
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.