Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/116139
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSegalerba, Gianluigi-
dc.contributor.authorBouvot, Kathrin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T13:29:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20T13:29:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-31-
dc.identifier.issn1841-8325-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/116139-
dc.description.abstractIn our analysis we deal with some interpretations of the concept of the idea in the history of philosophy. We concentrate our investigations onthe following authors: Plato, Descartes, Locke and Berkeley. In particular, - Throughout our analysis of Plato, we interpret ideas as the entities whichpave the way to the discovery of transcendence. Ideas show, by virtue of their existence, that not only the sphere of the average life and not only the sphere of perception exist. Correspondingly, individuals cannot be reduced to the dimension of their sphere perception. Through the recollection of the ideas, the subject can acknowledge that there is a reality dimension whichtranscends the dimension of the senses. - Descartes enables us to observe the search for the conditions of certainty regarding the activity of the minds. Descartes’ strategy, through his inquiryinto the innate idea of God and into the contents of this idea, is directed to the demonstration of the existence of God: the demonstration of the existence of God is functional to the foundation of the possibility of certainty of the mental and cognitive activities of the subject. - Locke considers the dimension of the internal and external experience as the very root of the ideas: this position corresponds to Locke’s refusal of any formof innatism whatsoever. Locke does not admit any innate idea, and sees the origins of the ideas only in the external and internal experience. Innatismof whichever ideas cannot be accepted; the subject is completely dependent onhis experience. - A regards Berkeley, we concentrate our investigation on Berkeley’s strategyof refusal of materialism. In Berkeley’s view, there is nothing else than ideas in the mind of the subject. All objects are equivalent to ideas. Fromthe existence of the ideas the subject cannot legitimately infer the existence of a reality which is independent of his own mind. The investigation on the characteristics and sources of the ideas demonstrates that there is no independent existence of entities outside God’s mind.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.subjectIdeaspt
dc.subjectPlatopt
dc.subjectPhaedopt
dc.subjectTranscendencept
dc.subjectPerceptionpt
dc.subjectDescartespt
dc.subjectGodpt
dc.subjectCertaintypt
dc.subjectLockept
dc.subjectIntellectpt
dc.subjectInnatismpt
dc.subjectBerkeleypt
dc.subjectMaterialismpt
dc.titleTranscendence and ideaspt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.firstPage49pt
degois.publication.lastPage102pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleAnalele Universitatii din Craiova - Seria Filosofiept
dc.date.updated2024-08-17T09:34:50Z-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://cis01.central.ucv.ro/analele_universitatii/filosofie/pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
degois.publication.volume49pt
dc.description.version7314-1223-A507 | Gianluigi Segalerba-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-3324246-
dc.date.embargo2022-07-31*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.researchunitIEF - Institute for Philosophical Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Arts and Humanities-
crisitem.author.orcid0009-0004-6127-4248-
Appears in Collections:IEF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

17
checked on Aug 21, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Aug 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.