Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114009
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Ana P.-
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Célia-
dc.contributor.authorCurvo-Semedo, Luís-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T10:47:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-14T10:47:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-27-
dc.identifier.issn2379-139Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/114009-
dc.description.abstractDual-energy computed tomography (DECT) uses different energy spectrum x-ray beams for differentiating materials with similar attenuation at a certain energy. Compared with single-energy CT, it provides images with better diagnostic performance and a potential reduction of contrast agent and radiation doses. There are different commercially available DECT technologies, with machines that may display two x-ray sources and two detectors, a single source capable of fast switching between two energy levels, a specialized detector capable of acquiring high- and low-energy data sets, and a filter splitting the beam into high- and low-energy beams at the output. Sequential acquisition at different tube voltages is an alternative approach. This narrative review describes the DECT technique using a Q&A format and visual representations. Physical concepts, parameters influencing image quality, postprocessing methods, applicability in daily routine workflow, and radiation considerations are discussed. Differences between scanners are described, regarding design, image quality variabilities, and their advantages and limitations. Additionally, current clinical applications are listed, and future perspectives for spectral CT imaging are addressed. Acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of different DECT scanners is important, as these could be adapted to each patient, clinical scenario, and financial capability. This technology is undoubtedly valuable and will certainly keep improving.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectdual-energy CTpt
dc.subjectspectral CTpt
dc.subjectdual-source CTpt
dc.subjectfast kVp switchingpt
dc.subjectdual-layer detector CTpt
dc.subjectsplit-filterpt
dc.subjectimage qualitypt
dc.subjectphoton countingpt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshPhantoms, Imagingpt
dc.subject.meshPhysical Phenomenapt
dc.subject.meshTomography, X-Ray Computedpt
dc.titlePros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: "One Does Not Fit All"pt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage195pt
degois.publication.lastPage216pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleTomographypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/tomography9010017pt
degois.publication.volume9pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-27*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

33
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Download(s)

19
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons