Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113927
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBação, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Joshua Dias-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorSimões, Marta-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T11:06:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T11:06:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-27-
dc.identifier.issn01762680pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/113927-
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the relationship between inequality and public social spending for an overall sample of 28 OECD countries spanning 1997 to 2017. We add to the literature by dissecting social expenditure according to nine programs and allowing for the existence of a non-linear relation in the context of a dynamic panel threshold model. The analysis reveals a positive contribution of old-age pensions to the Gini index of disposable income distribution, the most often used indicator of inequality, supporting the need to rethink old-age pension systems in this group of countries. The results for the other social expenditure components vary with the inequality measure used and country groups under analysis, highlighting the problems that may be associated with panel data even when a set of countries with many characteristics in common is used. Our results also stress the relevance of accommodating nonlinearities when explaining inequality, paving the way to a better understanding of its behaviour.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.relationUIDB/05037/2020 e UIDP/05037/2020pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectSocial expenditure composition, Income inequality, Dynamic threshold model, OECDpt
dc.titleSocial expenditure composition and inequality: A dynamic panel threshold analysis for OECD countriespt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage102510pt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024000120?via%3Dihubpt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102510pt
dc.date.embargo2024-02-27*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitGroup for Monetary and Financial Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitGroup for Monetary and Financial Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3340-1068-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0037-1827-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1046-2551-
Appears in Collections:I&D CQC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Social expenditure composition, inequality and growth in the OECD_ Labour market policies are most effective.pdfSocial expenditure composition and inequality: A dynamic panel threshold analysis for OECD countries661.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

82
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

74
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons