Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112406
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClay, Patricia M.-
dc.contributor.authorFerretti, Johanna-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Jennifer L.-
dc.contributor.authorGoti, Leyre-
dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy J.-
dc.contributor.authorSanturtun, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Jessica-
dc.contributor.authorLinke, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Jörn-
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Kåre Nolde-
dc.contributor.authorGoldsborough, David-
dc.contributor.authorGroeneveld, Rolf-
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Ana Rita-
dc.contributor.authorElegbede, Isa-
dc.contributor.authorRöckmann, Christine-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T11:51:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-31T11:51:16Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1054-3139pt
dc.identifier.issn1095-9289pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/112406-
dc.description.abstractWith increasing activities of multiple sectors in marine spaces, management of marine social–ecological systems requires more holistic ap- proac hes. Adopting suc h an approac h, ho w e v er, presents difficult institutional and disciplinary challenges. Here, w e use the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) as a case study on the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) and integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs). ICES includes EBM and IEAs in its Science Priorities and established IEA Working Groups (WGs) to carry out regional IEAs. But to what degree does this IEA WG work follow best practices? We examine policy documents, academic literature, and interview data from chairs of all IEA WGs. Results indicate mixed success. All groups acknowledge the holistic goals of IEA, and many use the IEA model as laid out b y L e vin et al . Ho w e v er, w e f ound a significant variation in the degree to which the full model is applied. We identified two primary areas f or impro v ement: (1) integration of social and economic issues and (2) in v olv ement of stak eholders. W e off er e xamples of ho w WGs ha v e been making progress to w ards full IEAs, discuss ho w ICES can further support this transition, and suggest lessons with respect to the adoption of EBM and IEAs more broadly.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherOxford University Presspt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)pt
dc.subjectIntegrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs)pt
dc.subjectSocial Science Methodspt
dc.subjectSemi-Structured Interviewspt
dc.titleImplementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea—conceptualizations, practice, and progresspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage1516pt
degois.publication.lastPage1528pt
degois.publication.issue5pt
degois.publication.titleICES Journal of Marine Sciencept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icesjms/fsad079pt
degois.publication.volume80pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:FEUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s)

25
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons