Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112303
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFarahmand, Asadullah-
dc.contributor.authorHussaini, Mohammad Salem-
dc.contributor.authorJawadi, Hussain Ali-
dc.contributor.authorAbrunhosa, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Brian F.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T11:26:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-29T11:26:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1866-6280-
dc.identifier.issn1866-6299-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/112303-
dc.description.abstractThis study used remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques to assess groundwater potential areas by applying two multi-criteria decision-making analyses tools in the Arghandab river basin. Twelve influencing parameters summarizing basin characteristics were gathered and generated using geospatial RS and GIS tools. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) were examined to weigh, ranking, and reclassify raster to produce groundwater potential maps. Two multi-criteria decision models were applied to compare results and suitability in the study area. The results of the AHP analysis delineate five groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) classified as very poor (29%), poor (22%), moderate (17%), high (19%), and very high (14%). On the other hand, the results of the ANP analysis classified GWPZs as very poor (25%), poor (9%), moderate (25%), high (30%), and very high (11%). To validate generated GWPZs maps, a total of 270 well locations data were utilized in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. ROC model accuracy in training and validation stages is marginally higher for the ANP model (0.810 and 0.823) as compared to the AHP model (0.749 and 0.742). The groundwater potential map delineated in this study offers a preliminary assessment to scientists, public authorities, and policy makers for sustainable management of groundwater resources in the study area.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectGroundwaterpt
dc.subjectRemote sensingpt
dc.subjectGISpt
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision analysispt
dc.subjectArghandab river basinpt
dc.titleMulti-criteria decision process to identify groundwater potential zones using geospatial tools in the Arghandab river basin, Afghanistanpt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.firstPage362pt
degois.publication.issue14pt
degois.publication.titleEnvironmental Earth Sciencespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12665-023-11046-3-
degois.publication.volume82pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.researchunitCITEUC - Centre for Earth and Space Research of the University of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6546-3952-
Appears in Collections:I&D CITEUC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

80
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Download(s)

68
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons