Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111619
Title: Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus
Authors: Ingen-Housz-Oro, S.
Schmidt, V.
Ameri, M. M.
Abe, R.
Brassard, A.
Mostaghimi, A.
Paller, A. S.
Romano, A.
Didona, B.
Kaffenberger, B. H.
Ben Said, B.
Thong, B. Y. H.
Ramsay, B.
Brezinova, E.
Milpied, B.
Mortz, C. G.
Chu, C. Y.
Sotozono, C.
Gueudry, J.
Fortune, D. G.
Dridi, S. M.
Tartar, D.
Do-Pham, G.
Gabison, E.
Phillips, E. J.
Lewis, F.
Salavastru, C.
Horvath, B.
Dart, J.
Setterfield, J.
Newman, J.
Schulz, J. T.
Delcampe, A.
Brockow, K.
Seminario-Vidal, L.
Jörg, L.
Watson, M. P.
Gonçalo, M. 
Lucas, M. C. Marco de 
Torres, M.
Noe, M. H.
Hama, N.
Shear, N. H.
O'Reilly, P.
Wolkenstein, P.
Romanelli, P.
Dodiuk-Gad, R. P.
Micheletti, R. G.
Tiplica, G. S.
Sheridan, R.
Rauz, S.
Ahmad, S.
Chua, S. L.
Flynn, T. H.
Pichler, W.
Le, S. T.
Maverakis, E.
Walsh, N. 
French, L. E.
Brüggen, M. C.
Keywords: Epidermal necrolysis; Stevens-Johnson syndrome; Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Sequelae; Quality of life; Delphi; Consensus
Issue Date: 22-Feb-2023
Publisher: BMJ
Serial title, monograph or event: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
Abstract: Background Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking. Objectives We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae. Methods Participants were sent a survey via the online tool “Survey Monkey” consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as ‘appropriate’; four statements were considered ‘uncertain’, and ultimately finally discarded. Conclusions Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111619
ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

Page view(s)

35
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

18
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons