Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111213
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Inês-
dc.contributor.authorPenedones, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Diogo-
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorBatel-Marques, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Daniel Pereira-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T09:39:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-05T09:39:01Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-09-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6874pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/111213-
dc.description.abstractBackground Cervical cancer is a major concern to women’s health, being the fourth most common cancer worldwide. A great percentage of these cancer is consequence of an HPV infection, namely from specific genotypes such as 16/18. Portuguese screening program subjects women to a reflex cytology triage every 5 years. Aptima® HPV is a screening test which presents better specificity than other tests which are used in Portugal (Hybrid Capture® 2 and Cobas® 4800) and still have a comparable sensitivity. The present study aims to estimate the number of diagnostic tests and costs that are avoided using Aptima® HPV compared to the use of two other tests, Hybrid Capture® 2 and Cobas® 4800, within the cervical cancer screening programme in Portugal. Methods A model, consisting of a decision-tree, was developed to represent the full Portuguese screening program for cervical cancer. This model is used to compare the costs resulting from using Aptima® HPV test versus the other tests used in Portugal, during 2 years. Other outcomes such as the number of additional tests and exams were also computed. This comparison considers the performance of each test (sensitivity and specificity) and assumes an equal price for every test compared. Results Cost savings resulting from the use of Aptima® HPV are estimated at approximately €382 million versus Hybrid Capture® 2 and €2.8 million versus Cobas® 4800. Moreover, Aptima® HPV prevents 265,443 and 269,856 additional tests and exams when compared with Hybrid Capture® 2 and Cobas® 4800. Conclusions The use of Aptima® HPV resulted in lower costs as well as less additional test and exams. These values result from the greater specificity of Aptima® HPV, which signals less false positive cases and consequently avoids carrying out additional tests.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectEarly detection of cancerpt
dc.subjectPapillomavirus infectionspt
dc.subjectCervical cancerpt
dc.subjectCosts and cost analysispt
dc.subject.meshFemalept
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshPortugalpt
dc.subject.meshEarly Detection of Cancerpt
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificitypt
dc.subject.meshPapillomaviridaept
dc.subject.meshDNA, Viralpt
dc.subject.meshUterine Cervical Neoplasmspt
dc.subject.meshUterine Cervical Dysplasiapt
dc.subject.meshPapillomavirus Infectionspt
dc.titlePerformance of Aptima-HPV in the cervical cancer screening program of Portugal: a cost-analysispt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage96pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleBMC Women's Healthpt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12905-023-02219-0pt
degois.publication.volume23pt
dc.date.embargo2023-03-09*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2814-3049-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4031-7339-
Appears in Collections:I&D CIBIT - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

31
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons