Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/111105
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDias, João Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Conceição-
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Marina-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T17:46:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-20T17:46:32Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2079-5971pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/111105-
dc.description.abstractEmpirical research on judicial systems requires diversified methodologies adapted to the contexts of courts and judicial actors. The experience gathered through the Permanent Observatory for Justice tells us that the support of judicial and political institutions and professionals’ associations are essential to reach a ‘hard-to-reach population’ and obtain robust results. The Observatory, with its interdisciplinary approach, had a significant public impact and contributed to public policies on justice. It was also fundamental to design and implement judicial training actions, through the Observatory’s Legal and Judicial Training Unit. The aim is to discuss the developed strategies to ensure the involvement of the institutional and judicial actors, build trust, and achieve valid results. The use of the project QUALIS, which assessed working conditions in Portuguese courts, allows us to focus on a concrete example of use of strategies and methodologies, with impacts on the improvement of the judicial system.pt
dc.description.abstractLa investigación empírica sobre justicia requiere metodologías diversificadas y adaptadas a los contextos de los tribunales y de los actores judiciales. La experiencia del Observatorio Permanente de la Justicia nos dice que el apoyo de las instituciones judiciales y políticas y de las asociaciones de profesionales es esencial para llegar a una “población difícil” y obtener resultados sólidos. El Observatorio, con su enfoque interdisciplinar, tuvo un impacto público significativo y contribuyó a las políticas públicas de justicia. También fue fundamental el desarrollo de acciones de formación, a través de la Unidad de Formación Jurídica y Judicial del Observatorio. El objetivo es discutir las estrategias desarrolladas para asegurar la participación de los actores institucionales y judiciales, generar confianza y alcanzar resultados válidos. El uso del proyecto QUALIS, que evaluó las condiciones de trabajo en los tribunales portugueses, nos permite centrarnos en un ejemplo de uso de estrategias y metodologías, con impactos en la mejora del sistema judicial.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherOñati International Institute for the Sociology of Lawpt
dc.relationUIDP/50012/2020pt
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-029039pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectSocio-legal studiespt
dc.subjectJudicial systempt
dc.subjectTrust and involvementpt
dc.subjectJudicial institutions and professionalspt
dc.subjectMethodologiespt
dc.subjectPortugalpt
dc.subjectEstudios sociojurídicospt
dc.subjectSistema judicialpt
dc.subjectConfianza y participaciónpt
dc.subjectActores y profesionales judicialespt
dc.subjectMetodologíaspt
dc.titleConducting socio-legal research in Portugal: From the experience of the Permanent Observatory for Justice to the study of working conditions in courtspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPageS10pt
degois.publication.lastPageS29pt
degois.publication.issueS1pt
degois.publication.locationGipuzkoapt
degois.publication.titleOñati Socio-Legal Seriespt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1735pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.35295/osls.iisl.1735pt
degois.publication.volume13pt
dc.date.embargo2023-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0884-8746-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9081-028X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4182-532X-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Conducting socio-legal research in Portugal.pdf374.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

103
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

47
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons