Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/109078
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Nuno-
dc.contributor.authorDonato, Maria Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorRomãozinho, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorLuxo, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Olga-
dc.contributor.authorCipriano, Maria Augusta-
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Carol-
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Alexandra-
dc.contributor.authorCalhau, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorSofia, Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T07:56:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-27T07:56:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-15-
dc.identifier.issn1471-230Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/109078-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. Methods: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive 13C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6–10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. Results: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4–77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9–77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5–66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3–68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04–17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24–18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22–22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. Conclusions: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.relationFCT - PIC/IC/83122/2007pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectClarithromycinpt
dc.subjectCompliancept
dc.subjectHelicobacter pyloript
dc.subjectLevofloxacinpt
dc.subjectTreatment failurept
dc.subject.mesh2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolespt
dc.subject.meshAdultpt
dc.subject.meshAgedpt
dc.subject.meshAmoxicillinpt
dc.subject.meshAnti-Bacterial Agentspt
dc.subject.meshBreath Testspt
dc.subject.meshClarithromycinpt
dc.subject.meshDrug Resistance, Bacterialpt
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combinationpt
dc.subject.meshFemalept
dc.subject.meshHelicobacter Infectionspt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshLevofloxacinpt
dc.subject.meshMalept
dc.subject.meshMedication Adherencept
dc.subject.meshMiddle Agedpt
dc.subject.meshNitroimidazolespt
dc.subject.meshPantoprazolept
dc.subject.meshPortugalpt
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiespt
dc.subject.meshProton Pump Inhibitorspt
dc.subject.meshTreatment Failurept
dc.subject.meshYoung Adultpt
dc.subject.meshHelicobacter pyloript
dc.titleBeyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?pt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage23pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleBMC Gastroenterologypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12876-015-0245-ypt
degois.publication.volume15pt
dc.date.embargo2015-02-15*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIEPQPF – Chemical Process Engineering and Forest Products Research Centre-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Sciences and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8902-0213-
Appears in Collections:FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

13
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons