Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/108498
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira Rodrigues, António-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Mónica-
dc.contributor.authorRoque, Fátima-
dc.contributor.authorFalcão, Amílcar C.-
dc.contributor.authorRamalheira, Elmano-
dc.contributor.authorFigueiras, Adolfo-
dc.contributor.authorHerdeiro, Maria Teresa-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T10:56:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T10:56:27Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-08-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/108498-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding physicians’ antibiotic-prescribing behaviour is fundamental when it comes to improving antibiotic use and tackling the growing rates of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of the study was to develop and validate -in terms of face validity, content validity and reliability- an instrument designed to assess the attitudes and knowledge underlying physician antibiotic prescribing. Methods: The questionnaire development and validation process comprised two different steps, namely: (1) content and face validation, which included a literature review and validation both by physicians and by Portuguese language and clinical psychology experts; and (2) reliability analysis, using the test-retest method, to assess the questionnaire’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC). The questionnaire includes 17 items assessing attitudes and knowledge about antibiotic prescribing and resistances and 9 items evaluating the importance of different sources of knowledge. The study was conducted in the catchment area covered by Portugal’s Northern Regional Health Administration and used a convenience sample of 61 primary-care and 50 hospital-care physicians. Results: Response rate was 64 % (49 % to retest) for primary-care physicians and 66 % (60 % to retest) for hospital-care physicians. Content validity resulted in 9 changes to professional concepts. Face validity assessment resulted in 19 changes to linguistic and interpretative terms. In the case of the reliability analysis, the ICC values indicated a minimum of fair to good reproducibility (ICC > 0.4), and the Cronbach alpha values were satisfactory (α > 0.70). Conclusions: The questionnaire developed is valid -in terms of face validity, content validity and reliability- for assessing physicians’ attitudes to and knowledge of antibiotic prescribing and resistance, in both hospital and primary-care settings, and could be a very useful tool for characterising physicians’ antibiotic-prescribing behaviour.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept
dc.relationPTDC/SAU-ESA/105530/2008pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subject.meshAnti-Bacterial Agentspt
dc.subject.meshAttitude of Health Personnelpt
dc.subject.meshHumanspt
dc.subject.meshPortugalpt
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultspt
dc.subject.meshDrug Resistance, Bacterialpt
dc.subject.meshHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practicept
dc.subject.meshPhysicianspt
dc.subject.meshPrescriptionspt
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnairespt
dc.titlePhysicians' attitudes and knowledge concerning antibiotic prescription and resistance: questionnaire development and reliabilitypt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage7pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleBMC Infectious Diseasespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12879-015-1332-ypt
degois.publication.volume16pt
dc.date.embargo2016-01-08*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3854-6549-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0500-4049-
Appears in Collections:I&D CNC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on May 15, 2024

Download(s)

12
checked on May 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons