Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/108316
Title: A modified Delphi study to determine the level of consensus across the European Union on the structures, processes and desired outcomes of the management of polypharmacy in older people
Authors: Stewart, Derek
Gibson-Smith, Kathrine
MacLure, Katie
Mair, Alpana
Alonso, Albert
Codina, Carles
Cittadini, Antonio
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando 
Fleming, Glenda
Gennimata, Dimitra
Gillespie, Ulrika
Harrison, Cathy
Junius-Walker, Ulrike
Kardas, Przemysław
Kempen, Thomas
Kinnear, Moira
Lewek, Pawel
Malva, João O. 
McIntosh, Jennifer
Scullin, Claire
Wiese, Birgitt
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Project: SIMPATHY project, grant agreement number 663082, co-funded by the European Commission CHAFEA Health Program. 
Serial title, monograph or event: PLoS ONE
Volume: 12
Issue: 11
Abstract: Background Inappropriate use of multiple medicines (inappropriate polypharmacy) is a major challenge in older people with consequences of increased prevalence and severity of adverse drug reactions and interactions, and reduced medicines adherence. The aim of this study was to determine the levels of consensus amongst key stakeholders in the European Union (EU) in relation to aspects of the management of polypharmacy in older people. Methods Forty-six statements were developed on aspects of healthcare structures, processes and desired outcomes, with consensus defined at 80% agreement. Panel members were strategists (e.g. directors, leading clinicians and commissioners) from each of the 28 EU member states, with a target recruitment of five per member state. Three Delphi rounds were conducted via email, with panel members being provided with summative results and collated, anonymised comments at the commencement of Rounds 2 and 3. Results Ninety panel members were recruited (64.3% of target), with high participation levels throughout the three Delphi rounds (91.1%, 83.3%, 72.2%). During Round 1, consensus was obtained for 27/46 statements (58.7%), with an additional two statements in Round 2 and none in Round 3. Consensus was obtained for statements relating to: potential gain arising from polypharmacy management (3/4 statements); strategic development (7/7); change management (5/7) indicator measures (4/6); legislation (0/3); awareness raising (5/5); polypharmacy reviews (5/7); and EU vision (0/7). Analysis of free text comments indicated that the vision statements were too ambitious and not achievable by the specified timeframe of 2025. Conclusion Consensus was obtained amongst key EU strategists around many aspects of polypharmacy management in older people. Notably, no consensus was achieved in relation to statements relating to the need to alter legislation in areas of healthcare delivery, remuneration and practitioner scope of practice. While the vision for the EU by 2025 was considered rather ambitious, there is great potential and clear opportunity to advance polypharmacy management throughout the EU and beyond.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/108316
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188348
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

Page view(s)

63
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons