Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107419
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDiogo, António Freire-
dc.contributor.authorCarmo, José Antunes do-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-10T10:27:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-10T10:27:50Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/107419-
dc.description.abstractStormwater urban drainage systems are typically designed in open channel flow. Pipe sewers must have enough capacity to transport maximum design flows for a given frequency of the project rainfall. The classic rational method or related procedures that are based on rational approaches are still currently used to a great extent, particularly for small urban drainage basins, and the pipes are frequently designed in uniform steady flow. Numerical integration of Saint-Venant equations for one-dimensional gradually varied unsteady flow allows the computation of waves’ progression along the pipes for given input surface hydrographs. This paper presents a comprehensive, systematic, simple, and original comparison between the peak flows that are achieved through simulation in unsteady flow using an implicit complete dynamic model, developed in the Laboratory of Hydraulics, Water Resources and Environment of Coimbra University, and those that are obtained with the classic rational method along urban drainage networks. Boundary conditions and some approximations typically considered in the methodologies are analyzed in detail. Classic rational approaches may underestimate the peak and design flows. Practical recommendations for the system design phase when rational approaches are used are also proposed. The need for indispensable requirements for suitable urbanization rules, intelligent management of surface runo in urban basins, and control measures for the reduction of peak flows entering existing networks is confirmed and reinforced.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjecturban drainage networkspt
dc.subjectopen channel flowpt
dc.subjectstormwater peak flowspt
dc.subjectsimulation in unsteady flowpt
dc.subjectclassic rational methodpt
dc.subjecturban watersheds managementpt
dc.titlePeak Flows and Stormwater Networks Design—Current and Future Management of Urban Surface Watershedspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage759pt
degois.publication.issue4pt
degois.publication.titleWater (Switzerland)pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w11040759pt
degois.publication.volume11pt
dc.date.embargo2019-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.researchunitMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2252-3403-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5527-3116-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Civil - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Jul 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Jul 2, 2024

Page view(s)

45
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Download(s)

21
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons