Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103429
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJulian, Valérie-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Daniela-
dc.contributor.authorO'Malley, Grace-
dc.contributor.authorMetz, Lore-
dc.contributor.authorFillon, Alicia-
dc.contributor.authorMiguet, Maud-
dc.contributor.authorCardenoux, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorDutheil, Frédéric-
dc.contributor.authorBoirie, Yves-
dc.contributor.authorDuclos, Martine-
dc.contributor.authorCourteix, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorThivel, David-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T10:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T10:40:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1662-4025-
dc.identifier.issn1662-4033-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/103429-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Since adolescents with obesity are prone to bone fragility during weight loss, the aim was to compare the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on bone density, geometry, and strength. Methods: Sixty-one adolescents were randomly assigned to 2 cycling trainings (HIIT and MICT) and a control (CTR, without training) group. Anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with hip structural analysis and the trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed before and after the 16-week intervention. Results: Body mass index (BMI) and fat mass (FM) percentage decreased at T1 versus T0 in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p = 0.01 for MICT), though to a larger extent in HIIT (p < 0.05). Total body bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) increased in both training groups (p < 0.001), but to a greater extent in HIIT for BMC (p < 0.05). Lumbar spine BMD and BMC increased in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p < 0.01 for MICT), with a time × group interaction between HIIT and CTR (p < 0.05) only. TBS increased in both training groups (p < 0.01 for HIIT, p < 0.05 for MICT). Hip BMD and BMC increased in both HIIT (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) and MICT (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). At the narrow neck (NN), endocortical diameter, width (p < 0.01), cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus (Z) (p < 0.05) increased only in the HIIT group, such as BMD and Z (p < 0.05) at the intertrochanteric region (IT) and average cortical thickness (p < 0.001) and width (p < 0.05) at the femoral shaft. At the NN and IT, the buckling ratio decreased only in the HIIT group (p < 0.05), predicting higher resistance to fracture. Conclusions: In addition to inducing greater BMI and FM percentage decreases in comparison to MICT, HIIT improves multisite bone density, geometry, and strength, which heighten the justification for HIIT as part of weight loss interventions in adolescents with obesity.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt
dc.subjectChildhood obesitypt
dc.subjectBone mineral densitypt
dc.subjectBone strengthpt
dc.subjectHigh-intensity interval trainingpt
dc.subjectModerate-intensity continuous trainingpt
dc.titleBone Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Adolescents with Obesitypt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.firstPage46pt
degois.publication.lastPage54pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleObesity Factspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000519271-
degois.publication.volume15pt
dc.date.embargo2022-01-01*
dc.identifier.pmid34864737-
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
dc.identifier.eissn1662-4033-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIDAF - Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0926-6617-
Appears in Collections:I&D CIDAF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Jul 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Jul 2, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Download(s)

360
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons