Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101227
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNic Lughadha, Eimear-
dc.contributor.authorBachman, Steven P.-
dc.contributor.authorLeão, Tarciso C. C.-
dc.contributor.authorForest, Félix-
dc.contributor.authorHalley, John M.-
dc.contributor.authorMoat, Justin-
dc.contributor.authorAcedo, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorBacon, Karen L.-
dc.contributor.authorBrewer, Ryan F. A.-
dc.contributor.authorGâteblé, Gildas-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Susana C.-
dc.contributor.authorGovaerts, Rafaël-
dc.contributor.authorHollingsworth, Peter M.-
dc.contributor.authorKrisai‐Greilhuber, Irmgard-
dc.contributor.authorLirio, Elton J.-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Paloma G. P.-
dc.contributor.authorNegrão, Raquel-
dc.contributor.authorOnana, Jean Michel-
dc.contributor.authorRajaovelona, Landy R.-
dc.contributor.authorRazanajatovo, Henintsoa-
dc.contributor.authorReich, Peter B.-
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Sophie L.-
dc.contributor.authorRivers, Malin C.-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Amanda-
dc.contributor.authorIganci, João-
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Gwilym P.-
dc.contributor.authorSmidt, Eric C.-
dc.contributor.authorAntonelli, Alexandre-
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Gregory M.-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Barnaby E.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T13:08:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-17T13:08:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2572-2611pt
dc.identifier.issn2572-2611pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/101227-
dc.description.abstractPlant and fungal biodiversity underpin life on earth and merit careful stewardship in an increasingly uncertain environment. However, gaps and biases in documented extinction risks to plant and fungal species impede effective management. Formal extinction risk assessments help avoid extinctions, through engagement, financial, or legal mechanisms, but most plant and fungal species lack assessments. Available global assessments cover c. 30% of plant species (ThreatSearch). Red List coverage overrepresents woody perennials and useful plants, but underrepresents single-country endemics. Fungal assessments overrepresent well-known species and are too few to infer global status or trends. Proportions of assessed vascular plant species considered threatened vary between global assessment datasets: 37% (ThreatSearch), and 44% (International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species). Our predictions, correcting for several quantifiable biases, suggest that 39% of all vascular plant species are threatened with extinction. However, other biases remain unquantified, and may affect our estimate. Preliminary trend data show plants moving toward extinction. Quantitative estimates based on plant extinction risk assessments may understate likely biodiversity loss: they do not fully capture the impacts of climate change, slow-acting threats, or clustering of extinction risk, which could amplify loss of evolutionary potential. The importance of extinction risk estimation to support existing and emerging conservation initiatives is likely to grow as threats to biodiversity intensify. This necessitates urgent and strategic expansion of efforts toward comprehensive and ongoing assessment of plant and fungal extinction risk.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.relationSfumato Foundation (funding the State of the World's Plants and Fungi project)pt
dc.relationSwedish Research Council, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectautomated conservation assessmentspt
dc.subjectbiodiversity losspt
dc.subjectextinction debtpt
dc.subjectextinction riskpt
dc.subjectGlobal Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) Target 2pt
dc.subjectInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Speciespt
dc.subjectphylogenetic diversity (PD)pt
dc.titleExtinction risk and threats to plants and fungipt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage389pt
degois.publication.lastPage408pt
degois.publication.issue5pt
degois.publication.titlePlants People Planetpt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ppp3.10146pt
degois.publication.volume2pt
dc.date.embargo2020-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.researchunitCFE - Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People & the Planet-
Appears in Collections:I&D CFE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

97
checked on Nov 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

120
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

204
checked on Sep 25, 2024

Download(s)

126
checked on Sep 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons