Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/101152
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastel-Branco, M. Margarida-
dc.contributor.authorFontes, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Isabel V.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T15:31:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-10T15:31:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-31-
dc.identifier.issn1886-3655pt
dc.identifier.issn1885-642Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/101152-
dc.description.abstractBackground: A correct selection of drugs prescribed, but also the choice of the appropriate inhaler device, is crucial for the control of respiratory diseases. Objective: To evaluate the inhaler technique and identify potential errors of patients when treated with inhalers by testing a routinary procedure to be implemented in any community pharmacy. Methods: Adults with asthma/COPD and under inhalation therapy were invited to demonstrate how they use their inhalers. After direct observation it was registered whether all the sequential steps included in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were performed. Results: The study involved 67 patients from 4 community pharmacies (Portugal central region): 34 (50.7%) males, 65.4 (SD=18.28) years old, 42 (62.7%) with COPD, and 23 (34.3%) using more than one inhaler. The 67 patients used 95 inhalers, comprising: 57 (60.0%) multiple dose DPI (dry powder inhalers), 18 (18.9%) single dose DPI, 16 (16.8%) pMDI (pressurized metered dose inhalers), 2 (2.1%) pMDI+spacer and 2 (2.1%) SMI (soft mist inhalers). No errors were made only by 9 (13.4%) patients. In the 75 DPIs techniques, the most frequent errors were ‘no previous forced expiration’ (46=61.3%) and ‘no 10s apnea after inhalation’ (51=68.0%); in the 16 pMDIs techniques common errors were ‘lack of hand-lung coordination’ (7=43.8 %), ‘no previous forced exhalation’ (8=50.0%) and ‘no apnea after inhalation’ (10=62.5%). After inhaling from 56 devices containing corticosteroids, 34 (60.7%) of the patients did not wash their mouth. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the possibility of performing this procedure routinely in Portuguese community pharmacies and also its utility, since 58 (87%) of patients had at least one error during the inhalers use.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt
dc.subjectAsthmapt
dc.subjectPulmonary Diseasept
dc.subjectChronic Obstructivept
dc.subjectNebulizers and Vaporizerspt
dc.subjectPharmaciespt
dc.subjectPatient Education as Topicpt
dc.subjectQuality Assurancept
dc.subjectHealth Carept
dc.subjectPortugalpt
dc.titleIdentification of inhaler technique errors with a routine procedure in Portuguese community pharmacypt
dc.typearticleen_US
degois.publication.firstPage1072pt
degois.publication.lastPage1076pt
degois.publication.issue4pt
degois.publication.titlePharmacy Practicept
dc.date.updated2022-07-30T23:28:21Z-
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.18549/PharmPract.2017.04.1072pt
degois.publication.volume15pt
dc.description.version3910-3178-31BA | MARIA MARGARIDA COUTINHO DE SEABRA CASTEL-BRANCO CAETANO-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-144359-
dc.date.embargo2017-12-31*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
crisitem.author.researchunitICBR Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6533-9932-
Appears in Collections:FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Nov 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 8, 2024

Download(s)

33
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons