Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Implications of a defined daily dose fixed database for drug utilization research studies: The case of statins in Portugal
Authors: Abrantes, Catarina 
Tonin, Fernanda S.
Reis-Pardal, Joana
Castel-Branco, Margarida 
Furtado, Claudia 
Figueiredo, Isabel V. 
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando 
Keywords: defined daily dose; drug utilization; reproducibility of results
Issue Date: 2-Mar-2021
Publisher: Wiley
Serial title, monograph or event: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume: 87
Issue: 9
Abstract: Aims: Given the discrepancies between PDDs (prescribed daily doses) and DDDs (defined daily doses), we aimed to assess the extent of error in the results of an 18-year population-level study on statin utilization in Portugal. Methods: The Portuguese regulatory agency provided data for the period 2000–2018 on statin dispensing (C10AA). The DDDs were gathered from the ATC/DDD database. DDDs were calculated by the DDD year-by-year approach (DDDYEAR) and by the DDD last-year approach (DDDLAST). PDDs were calculated according to the year-by-year approach (PDDYEAR). Statin annual utilization rates per 1000 inhabitants per day were also calculated. Percent errors were calculated for PDDYEAR and DDDYEAR units. Results: The DDDYEAR approach revealed decreases in the consumption of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin in 2009, when their DDD was modified. Conversely, the results from both DDDLAST and PDDYEAR approaches indicated gradual changes in the actual consumption of all statins in Portugal. Before 2009, atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin utilization was greatly overestimated by DDDYEAR/1000 inhabitants/day. The average dose of lovastatin prescribed in the past 18 years (20 mg) was below the assigned DDDs during the study period, varying from 30 mg to 45 mg. Conversely, the PDD for fluvastatin was above the DDD values (ranging from 40 mg in 2000 to 70 mg in 2016). For atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin, national PDDs were above the assigned DDD until the DDD modification in 2009. Conclusions: A more dynamic system, based on national and annually updated DDDs, should be able to reduce discrepancies between DDDs and PDDs and the bias in utilization studies.
ISSN: 0306-5251
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14770
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FFUC- Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record


checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

checked on May 15, 2024


checked on May 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM




Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.