Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/96783
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Filipe-
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Susana-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T11:08:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-22T11:08:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-03-
dc.identifier.issn2195-7819pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/96783-
dc.description.abstractThe political and financial investments in the implementation of forensic DNA databases and the ethical issues related to their use and expansion justify inquiries into their performance and general utility. The main function of a forensic DNA database is to produce matches between individuals and crime scene stains, which requires a constant input of individual profiles and crime scene stains. This is conditioned, among other factors, by the legislation, namely the criteria for inclusion of profiles and the periods of time and conditions for their retention and/or deletion. This article aims to provide an overview of the different legislative models for DNA databasing in Europe and ponder if wider inclusion criteria – and, consequently, database size – translates into more matches between profiles of crime scene stains and included individuals (performance ratio). The legislation governing forensic DNA databases in 22 countries in the European Union was analysed in order to propose a typology of two major groups of legislative criteria for inclusion/retention of profiles that can be classified as having either expansive effects or restrictive effects. We argue that expansive criteria for inclusion and retention of profiles do not necessarily translate into significant gains in output performance.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherBMCpt
dc.relationFCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009231pt
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/34143/2006pt
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH/BD/72253/2010/PTpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectForensic geneticspt
dc.subjectDNA databasept
dc.subjectCrimept
dc.subjectCriminal lawpt
dc.subjectProportionalitypt
dc.subjectEuropept
dc.subjectPrüm decisionpt
dc.titleForensic DNA databases in European countries: is size linked to performance?pt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage12pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleLife Sciences, Society and Policypt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/2195-7819-9-12pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/2195-7819-9-12pt
degois.publication.volume9pt
dc.date.embargo2013-12-03*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6449-9061-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8554-7619-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Apr 1, 2024

Page view(s)

91
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons