Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCasaleiro, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorRelvas, Ana Paula-
dc.contributor.authorDias, João Paulo-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T17:18:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-11T17:18:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-11-
dc.identifier.issn2156-7964pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422-
dc.description.abstractThe article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherInternational Association for Court Administrationpt
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-029039pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectWorking conditionspt
dc.subjectJudicial professionalspt
dc.subjectProfessional stresspt
dc.subjectBurnoutpt
dc.titleA Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studiespt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPagep.2pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.locationWilliamsburg, VApt
degois.publication.titleInternational Journal for Court Administrationpt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.36745/ijca.334pt
degois.publication.volume12pt
dc.date.embargo2021-03-11*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Economics-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9312-7219-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9011-2230-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0884-8746-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions Studies.pdf757.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

340
checked on Sep 30, 2022

Download(s)

137
checked on Sep 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons