Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/92872
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, D. M.-
dc.contributor.authorTerra, A. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-07T20:54:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-07T20:54:25Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.isbn9789811599088pt
dc.identifier.isbn9789811599071pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/92872-
dc.descriptionThe Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 R. Babo et al. (eds.), Workgroups eAssessment: Planning, Implementing and Analysing Frameworks, Intelligent Systems Reference Library 199,pt
dc.description.abstractPart of the students’ academic path is the elaboration, construction and presentation of works where there is an interaction between various elements of a group. It is common, in many countries, for students to actively participate in groups, either between classmates or even from another country, with the aim of designing, creating and presenting tasks, where information should be viewed and changed by all group members, if possible, simultaneously. A few years ago, in order to be able to carry out this kind of academic group work, it was necessary to synchronize times, days and places with the group members so that the work meeting could take place. Now, this interaction is virtually possible, first with chats, videoconferences and a variety of virtual tools and their many possibilities. This chapter starts from a literature review on studies with online collaborative work platforms to analyze, through testimonials from higher education students, if online collaborative work tools have been an asset for students during their academic career, including participation in the Erasmus Program in different countries. It was found that university students find these tools useful, despite the fact that the uses do not have the support or guidance of their educational institutions and are not accompanied by an in-depth study of these tools, which have caused problematic situations that could have been avoided.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringer Singaporept
dc.rightsembargoedAccesspt
dc.subjectIntelligent Systems Reference Library; Computational Intelligence; Google Docs; Google Drive; One Drive; Microsoft; Cloud Computing; Collaborative Writing; OCW; Online collaborative writing tools; Online collaborative writingpt
dc.titleOnline and Collaborative Tools During Academic and Erasmus Studiespt
dc.typebookPartpt
degois.publication.firstPage85pt
degois.publication.lastPage115pt
degois.publication.locationSingaporept
degois.publication.titleWorkgroups eAssessment: Planning, Implementing and Analysing Frameworkspt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-981-15-9908-8_4pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-15-9908-8_4pt
degois.publication.volume199pt
dc.date.embargo2026-12-31*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo2190pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypebookPart-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20261231-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEIS20 - Centre of 20th Century Interdisciplinary Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9035-3480-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1292-2849-
Appears in Collections:FLUC Secção de Informação - Livros e Capítulos de Livros
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Login
Oliveira.Terra.2021.OCT.Cap4.Springer.pdf708.28 kBAdobe PDFEmbargo Access    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

203
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.