Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/90492
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Ângela-
dc.contributor.authorStefanik, Iwa-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Cláudia-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Mónica-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Teresa C.-
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Pedro Lopes-
dc.contributor.authorBorrell, Carme-
dc.contributor.authorDimitroulopoulou, Sani-
dc.contributor.authorRican, Stéphane-
dc.contributor.authorMitsakou, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorMarí-Dell’Olmo, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorSchweikart, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorCorman, Diana-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Carlos A. Bana e-
dc.contributor.authorGrupo EURO-HEALTH Investigators-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T00:05:19Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T00:05:19Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-13-
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/90492-
dc.description.abstractBackground Population health measurements are recognised as appropriate tools to support public health monitoring. Yet, there is still a lack of tools that offer a basis for policy appraisal and for foreseeing impacts on health equity. In the context of persistent regional inequalities, it is critical to ascertain which regions are performing best, which factors might shape future health outcomes and where there is room for improvement. Methods Under the EURO-HEALTHY project, tools combining the technical elements of multi-criteria value models and the social elements of participatory processes were developed to measure health in multiple dimensions and to inform policies. The flagship tool is the Population Health Index (PHI), a multidimensional measure that evaluates health from the lens of equity in health determinants and health outcomes, further divided into sub-indices. Foresight tools for policy analysis were also developed, namely: (1) scenarios of future patterns of population health in Europe in 2030, combining group elicitation with the Extreme-World method and (2) a multi-criteria evaluation framework informing policy appraisal (case study of Lisbon). Finally, a WebGIS was built to map and communicate the results to wider audiences. Results The Population Health Index was applied to all European Union (EU) regions, indicating which regions are lagging behind and where investments are most needed to close the health gap. Three scenarios for 2030 were produced - (1) the 'Failing Europe' scenario (worst case/increasing inequalities), (2) the 'Sustainable Prosperity' scenario (best case/decreasing inequalities) and (3) the 'Being Stuck' scenario (the EU and Member States maintain the status quo). Finally, the policy appraisal exercise conducted in Lisbon illustrates which policies have higher potential to improve health and how their feasibility can change according to different scenarios. Conclusions The article makes a theoretical and practical contribution to the field of population health. Theoretically, it contributes to the conceptualisation of health in a broader sense by advancing a model able to integrate multiple aspects of health, including health outcomes and multisectoral determinants. Empirically, the model and tools are closely tied to what is measurable when using the EU context but offering opportunities to be upscaled to other settings.pt
dc.description.sponsorshipThe EURO-HEALTHY project (Shaping EUROpean policies to promote HEALTHequity) has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 re-search and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 643398. Add-itionally, this study was supported by the Centre of Studies in Geographyand Spatial Planning (CEGOT), funded by national funds through the Founda-tion for Science and Technology (FCT) under the reference UID/GEO/04084/2019. The authors Angela Freitas and Cláudia Costa are recipients of Individ-ual Doctoral Fellowships funded by national funds through the Foundationfor Science and Technology (FCT), under the references SFRH/BD/123091/2016 and SFRH/BD/132218/2017, respectively.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherBMCpt
dc.relationEuropean Union (EU)pt
dc.relationCentre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning (CEGOT) - Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)pt
dc.relationPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technologypt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt
dc.subjectHealth equitypt
dc.subjectEuropean Union regionspt
dc.subjectGeographic inequalitiespt
dc.subjectPopulation Health Indexpt
dc.subjectParticipatory approachpt
dc.subjectForesightpt
dc.subjectScenariospt
dc.subjectPolicy evaluationpt
dc.subjectWebGISpt
dc.titleAdvancing tools to promote health equity across European Union regions: the EURO-HEALTHY projectpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage18pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.locationCAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLANDpt
degois.publication.titleHEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMSpt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12961-020-0526-ypt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12961-020-0526-ypt
degois.publication.volume18pt
dc.date.embargo2020-02-13*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEGOT – Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEGOT – Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEGOT – Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEISUC - Center for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7658-8475-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1081-2147-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7422-6139-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9448-9542-
Appears in Collections:I&D IBILI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
document.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Nov 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

10
checked on May 2, 2023

Page view(s)

386
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

169
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons