Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80197
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDias, João Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Conceição-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-16T10:17:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-16T10:17:01Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-13-
dc.identifier.issn1871-515Xpt
dc.identifier.issn1871-515Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/80197-
dc.description.abstractThe implementation of the new map/organisation of the judicial system in Portugal, approved in 2013, has become an example of an externally induced reform. The biggest reform process ever seen within the justice system took place under the rule of the Troika in Portugal, together with budget cuts to the justice system as a result of the Portuguese financial crisis (since external financial support required strict austerity measures). The key word was therefore concentration: the concentration of courts, litigation and resources. The reform of the organisation/map of the judicial system reduced 232 lower courts to 23 district courts, each with jurisdiction over a larger territory and greater specialisation. Most of the former smaller courts were transformed into local sections or branches of the now streamlined judicial system, in an attempt to retain some proximity to citizens. However, a significant number of cases are now heard in district courts rather than in these local courts. This reorganisation, including a totally new management model, led to profound organisational changes and altered the relationship between citizens and the justice administration. The aim of this article is to discuss the context, actors and politics involved in this judicial reform process as an example of a top-down strategy, designed under pressure in response to an external ‘order’ and influenced by internal actors, which failed to consider citizenship and democracy.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherUopen Journalspt
dc.relation29039pt
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-029039pt
dc.relationQuality of Justce in Portugal! Impact of working conditons in the performance of judges and public prosecutorspt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectJudicial reformpt
dc.subjectCitizenship and democracypt
dc.subjectJudicial and political actorspt
dc.subjectPortugalpt
dc.titleJudicial Reforms ‘Under Pressure’: The New Map/Organisation of the Portuguese Judicial Systempt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage174pt
degois.publication.lastPage186pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.locationUtrechtpt
degois.publication.titleUtrecht Law Reviewpt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/448/pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.18352/ulr.448pt
degois.publication.volume14pt
dc.date.embargo2018-07-13*
dc.date.periodoembargo0pt
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.researchunitCES – Centre for Social Studies-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitUniversity of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0884-8746-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9081-028X-
Appears in Collections:I&D CES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Judicial Reforms Under Pressure.pdf358.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s) 50

571
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

283
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons