Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Attachment in patients with mental health disorders: Associations with patient and partner’s adjustment||Authors:||Alves, Stephanie
Canavarro, Maria Cristina
Dattilio, Frank M.
|Keywords:||Attachment; Couples; Dyadic adjustment; Psychopathology; Quality of Life||Issue Date:||2015||Serial title, monograph or event:||Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice||Volume:||4||Issue:||4||Abstract:||Within the context of mental health disorders, the research examining the association between attachment and couples’ adjustment in general has been disappointingly lean. This includes consideration of the attachment representations of both members, as well as the dyadic attachment styles. This study analyzed the association between attachment and patient and partner’s individual and dyadic adjustment, as well as the associations between dyad attachment styles and patient and partner’s adjustment. The sample consisted of 54 couples, in which one member had been diagnosed with a mental health disorder (clinical groups), and 54 couples from the general population (control group). Participants completed the following self-report measures: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI); the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire EUROHIS-QOL-8; the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), and the Experiences in Close Relationship-Short Form (ECR-SF). The results depict that couples from the clinical groups presented lower levels of QoL and dyadic adjustment and higher levels of depressive and anxious symptoms as compared to couples from the general population. Couples from the clinical groups also showed higher scores on attachment anxiety and avoidance. Women who possessed a clinical diagnosis, in particular reported higher scores in attachment anxiety whereas men with a clinical diagnosis were found to engage in attachment avoidance. Regarding both dyadic attachment styles, dyads in which the two partners were insecurely attached had significantly poorer individual and dyadic adjustment compared to dyads in which both partners were secure. The clinical implications of the results are considered, as well as some key directives for future research.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10316/47021||DOI:||10.1037/cfp0000048||Rights:||openAccess|
|Appears in Collections:||I&D CINEICC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Alves et al. 2015_CFPRP.pdf||489.75 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Oct 6, 2020
Page view(s) 50485
checked on Oct 20, 2020
checked on Oct 20, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.