Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/11353
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStubbe, Isar-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-08T15:30:25Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-08T15:30:25Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationPré-Publicações DMUC. 06-13 (2006)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/11353-
dc.description.abstractA. Joyal and M. Tierney showed that the internal suplattices in the topos of sheaves on a locale are precisely the modules on that locale. Using a totally different technique, I shall show a generalization of this result to the case of (ordered) sheaves on a (small) quantaloid. Then I make a comment on module-equivalence versus sheafequivalence, using a recent observation of B. Mesablishvili and the notion of ‘centre’ of a quantaloid.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCentro de Matemática da Universidade de Coimbraen_US
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectQuantaloiden_US
dc.subjectQuantaleen_US
dc.subjectLocaleen_US
dc.subjectOrdered sheafen_US
dc.subjectModuleen_US
dc.subjectCentreen_US
dc.titleMore on Q-modulesen_US
dc.typepreprinten_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_816b-
item.openairetypepreprint-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Matemática - Vários
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
More on Q-modules.pdf171.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.