Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/100619
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFalacho, Rui I.-
dc.contributor.authorPalma, Paulo J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Joana A.-
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Maria H.-
dc.contributor.authorCaramelo, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorViegas, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Fernando-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T10:50:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-07T10:50:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-02-
dc.identifier.issn1420-3049pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/100619-
dc.description.abstractCollagenated porcine-derived bone graft materials exhibit osteoconductive properties and the development of different formulations intends to enhance bone regeneration. This study aims to evaluate bone healing in a rabbit cancellous bone defect in response to grafting with different physicochemical forms of heterologous porcine bone. Twenty-six adult male New Zealand White rabbits received two critical size femoral bone defects per animal (n = 52), each randomly assigned to one of the five tested materials (Apatos, Gen-Os, mp3, Putty, and Gel 40). Animals were sacrificed at 15- and 30-days post-surgery. Qualitative and quantitative (new bone, particle and connective tissue percentages) histological analyses were performed. Histomorphometry showed statistically significant differences in all evaluated parameters between mp3 and both Putty and Gel 40 groups, regardless of the timepoint (p < 0.05). Moreover, statistical differences were observed between Apatos and both Putty (p = 0.014) and Gel 40 (p = 0.007) groups, at 30 days, in regard to particle percentage. Within each group, regarding new bone formation, mp3 showed significant differences (p = 0.028) between 15 (40.93 ± 3.49%) and 30 (52.49 ± 11.04%) days. Additionally, intragroup analysis concerning the percentage of particles revealed a significant reduction in particle occupied area from 15 to 30 days in mp3 and Gen-Os groups (p = 0.009). All mp3, Gen-Os and Apatos exhibited promising results in terms of new bone formation, thus presenting suitable alternatives to be used in bone regeneration.pt
dc.language.isoporpt
dc.relationFCT UIDB/04033/2020pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectbone graftingpt
dc.subjectbone regenerationpt
dc.subjectcollagenated bonept
dc.subjecthistomorphometrypt
dc.subjectporcine bone graft; rabbit modelpt
dc.subject.meshAnimalspt
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible Materialspt
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutespt
dc.subject.meshCancellous Bonept
dc.subject.meshHeterograftspt
dc.subject.meshMalept
dc.subject.meshRabbitspt
dc.subject.meshSwinept
dc.subject.meshTibiapt
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantationpt
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesispt
dc.titleCollagenated Porcine Heterologous Bone Grafts: Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone Formation Using Different Physical Forms in a Rabbit Cancellous Bone Modelpt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage1339pt
degois.publication.issue5pt
degois.publication.titleMoleculespt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules26051339pt
degois.publication.volume26pt
dc.date.embargo2021-03-02*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1pt-
crisitem.author.researchunitICBR Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitCEMMPRE - Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7099-8871-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4730-8072-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0015-8604-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8780-9379-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Med. Dentária - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

89
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Download(s)

28
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons