Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/100599
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Gonçalo-
dc.contributor.authorMykolyshyn, Sergii-
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorBernardino, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Vasco-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T09:38:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T09:38:47Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/100599-
dc.description.abstractConceptual modeling describes the physical or social aspects of the world abstractly, encompassing the interpretation of data production, gathering, visualization, and analysis. The quality of the data analysis system will limit the excellence of any decision-making process. Thus, accurately specifying the physical data model is essential. The primary goal of our work is to compare tools that can create this physical model. We recognize several types of data models, but we only include the relational data model. We evaluate free and commercial data modeling tools. But it is challenging to decide how to compare them and which elements are crucial. We propose a new approach for software tools' evaluation based on the Business Readiness Rating (BRR) model and the OSSpal evaluation methodology. In this work, we show that this new methodology can be tailored to the needs of each individual developer or team, thus providing proper and meaningful results. Also, by applying this hybrid approach to the evaluation of data modelling tools, we show it can robustly handle the bias from lesser relevant evaluation categories.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.relationPOCI-01-0247-FEDER-039555pt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectData modelingpt
dc.subjectData modeling toolspt
dc.subjectDatabase management systemspt
dc.subjectDesign toolspt
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Data Modeling Design Toolspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage3351pt
degois.publication.lastPage3365pt
degois.publication.titleIEEE Accesspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139071pt
degois.publication.volume10pt
dc.date.embargo2022-01-01*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCISUC - Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.researchunitCISUC - Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Sciences and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentresearchunitFaculty of Sciences and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7095-5003-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0851-8165-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9699-1133-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9660-2011-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4225-9075-
Appears in Collections:I&D CISUC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Comparative_Analysis_of_Data_Modeling_Design_Tools.pdf1.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Apr 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Apr 2, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

210
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons